The 40 Mile Loop Land Trust is very interested in what the design of the IBR will be and the time to make our thoughts know is now. Comments close on 11/18/2024 so send before midnight.

We’re submitting comments and encourage others to. If you’d like to see ours and use them, we suggest:

Take each Word document:

Email each comment PDF separately to: draftseis@interstatebridge.org

Note:

• It is OK to send one comment personally and a second one with your business letterhead.
• It is OK to have other members of the household send in the same comment again
• Any friends and associates can send in these comments
• We want as many comments sent in as possible

Questions? Reach out to info@40mileloop.org

Sometime during the Spring of 2021, Gregg Everhart, a former PP&R Landscape Architect and staff assigned to assist the 40 Mile Loop, handed off to Jim Sjulin a file folder entitled “40-Mile Loop History.”

Obviously, the file contained information about the early years of the 40 Mile Loop as a concept and some information about the early years of the 40 Mile Loop Land Trust. One document was an eighteen-page transcription of an interview with Barbara Walker, a person whose name registered as synonymous with the 40 Mile Loop for over 30 years. The transcription is derived from a recorded interview conducted by Ryan Durocher, an AmeriCorps member from Portland Parks & Recreation’s Planning Department, on October 18, 2002, at Tulley’s Coffee in Portland City Hall.

The interview in its entirety pulled few punches and is an interesting read. The portion of the interview that pertains to the origin of the term “40 Mile Loop” is reproduced below (and slightly edited for brevity):

Barbara Walker: Well, there would be people who’d give you a different idea of where the 40 Mile Loop started. We’d found the Olmsted plan through Doug Bridges* , which had been shelved. I mean it was still considered, still operated, but there wasn’t even a copy anywhere. We had to go find a copy.

It’s called the 40 Mile Loop, not because the Olmsteds called it that, but because a person in the park bureau ran one of those little pie cutters that measure miles+, I don’t remember what you call those machines, but you go around on a map – now you wouldn’t do it that way, but back in those days, slide rule days – you went around and the route that the Olmsteds had planned on the map was 40 miles.

So we called it the 40 Mile Loop. And Doug Bridges knew from the beginning that it was going to be more than forty miles, we all did. Because that made Mt. Tabor the farthest east we went, and the city had grown. It was crazy to limit this idea – with the Columbia, and Columbia Slough, and Johnson Creek, and the growth that pushed us out – to Mt Tabor. So what’s interesting to me now is where we saw the circle coming around is what’s now the Gresham-Fairview Trail. Not the exact alignment, there was a power line we thought would be able to come down. And that wasn’t even a dream of anyone except some of us who had seen this in the back.

*Doug Bridges was Superintendent of Portland Parks & Recreation in the late 1970’s.

+A “pie cutter that measure miles” is formally known as a planimeter, a surveying tool.

During our last board meeting we reaffirmed Lou Reynoldson as President and Walter Valenta as Vice-President. Deb Scott was elected Treasurer and the Secretary office needs to be filled.

We invite you to join our work advocating for filling the gaps on the 40-Mile Loop Trail and maintaining them. Send a note to info at 40mileloop dot org!

Portland City Council is considering the referral of a Portland Parks & Recreation (PP&R) operating levy for this November’s ballot.

It would protect and restore recreation programs, park services, and our natural areas, including:

• Recreation for All: end PP&R’s dependence on fees and transition to an equity-focused approach. Safely re-open community centers and pools, and resume fitness, arts, senior and youth, and environmental education programs for summer 2021;
• Protect and Grow Nature: keep parks cleaner, safer, and more welcoming for all Portlanders. Plant new trees and proactively care for existing trees to help ensure clean water, protect wildlife, and diminish the impacts of climate change;
• Community Partnerships: co–design recreational programming and provide resources to improve access to communities of color, families experiencing poverty, and refugees and immigrants, and provide community oversight.

If approved by voters in November, this levy would mark the beginning of a new, financially stable era for our parks and recreation system where parks and natural areas will be better cared for, and cost will not be a barrier to enjoying recreation programs. The proposed levy of .80 per $1,000 assessed value would raise an estimated average $48 million per year over five years. A home with an assessed value of $200,000 would pay about $13 a month.

Visit the PP&R website to learn more: https://www.portland.gov/parks/sustainable-future-our-park-system

You can share your input in a few ways:

1. Tell us what you like about your parks and recreation system and what you’d like to see more of in the future: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/XZVM3L8

2. Reach out to your elected officials. On July 22, the Portland City Council will vote on whether to refer this proposal to the ballot. Please send your comments to Portland City Council Contact emails:            

Mayor Ted Wheeler (MayorWheeler@portlandoregon.gov)           

Commissioner Jo Ann Hardesty (joann@portlandoregon.gov)

Commissioner Chloe Eudaly (chloe@portlandoregon.gov)

Commissioner Amanda Fritz (amanda@portlandoregon.gov)

Adena Long, Portland Parks & Recreation Director (parksdirector@portlandoregon.gov)

3. Share your enthusiasm with your networks. In this video, three Portlanders share why investing in our parks is so critical now, and so important for the next generation. Watch and share here: https://youtu.be/xPCwSEkJ6KY